LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for AMIA-L Archives


AMIA-L Archives

AMIA-L Archives


February 2002


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

(was tape storage direction) now MiniDV or DVD-RAM? (15 messages)
16mm loop question (3 messages)
35/32mm (4 messages)
35mm 8 Plate Steenbeck for sale (2 messages)
9/11 Footage (1 message)
<No subject> (1 message)
A Concern: Ampex 611 tape (1 message)
Al Beck (1 message)
AMIA Office News (1 message)
Antwort: Re: [AMIA-L] Preserving digital video vs. film (2 messages)
Antwort: Re: [AMIA-L] Preserving digital video vs.film (1 message)
Antwort: Re: [AMIA-L] stability of digital formats (1 message)
ARSC Annual Meeting--2nd call for papers (1 message)
Audio Heritage Preservation - NCPC Annual Conference (1 message)
automated response (1 message)
Awards Committee Seeks Nominations (1 message)
BAD FORMATTING (1 message)
Baron Munchhausen Quiery (3 messages)
BetaSP obsolete? (2 messages)
Call for Papers (1 message)
Call for papers on newsreels (1 message)
Catalina Island films (4 messages)
Copyright case... (14 messages)
Copyright case..., oops (1 message)
Discovery Channel Footage Licensing (1 message)
Employment opportunity at the Archives of Ontario (1 message)
Employment opportunity with U.S. BBG (1 message)
Evaluating the tension pressure inside a roll of fil m or magnetic tape pack - part II. (1 message)
Evaluating the tension pressure inside a roll of film or magnetic tape pack. (2 messages)
Feature Films, TV and Student Questions (1 message)
FIAF CONGRESS - April 2002 (1 message)
film preservation (and Bob Harris) in the news (1 message)
Fire at BiFi (2 messages)
Fueling the flame: Hard Disk storage for archives (3 messages)
fw: ONLINE GROUP TO GIVE ADVICE REGARDING COPYRIGHTS (1 message)
Fwd: [cml-pro] negative restoration (2 messages)
Good News! (1 message)
Gore Vidal's stuff (7 messages)
Griffith's ABRAHAM LINCOLN (1 message)
HELP SAVE THE EGLINTON THEATRE !! (4 messages)
Home Movies, etc. (1 message)
in search of... (4 messages)
Incomplete film washing (2 messages)
Incomplete washing (was "Tension inside a roll...") (1 message)
Intellectual Property Commons (1 message)
International Storage standards for film & video (2 messages)
Joliet Prison silent film (1 message)
Jonathan Dennis (1 message)
LA Times Today! (2 messages)
mag stereo (1 message)
Mary Ellen Bute.Busby Berkeley (1 message)
More from Macau (1 message)
More on Bush and Records.... (1 message)
More on copyright case (1 message)
More on MOMA Stills Dept (2 messages)
negative restoration-response (3 messages)
negative restoration-response-clarification on wetga te printing (1 message)
new copyrights on old cartoons (1 message)
new email address (3 messages)
New Member with "dumb question" (2 messages)
New NEDCC Conference (1 message)
Nitrate Picture Negatives (1 message)
Nitrate Picture Negatives-response (3 messages)
Nitrate Picture Negatives-response comment (1 message)
Nitrate poisoning - article (1 message)
Nitrate Telecine in Chicago? (13 messages)
Peerless Process (2 messages)
Polavision (5 messages)
Pre-1930 footage of Northern Spain (1 message)
Pre-Digital Days (2 messages)
Preserving digital video on Removable Hard Disk Drives- warni ng ;-) (1 message)
Preserving digital video vs. film (42 messages)
Preserving digital video vs. film - Warning LONG EMAIL (5 messages)
Preserving digital video vs.film (1 message)
Process Washes (1 message)
Processing residue (2 messages)
radio archives (1 message)
Reality Check (1 message)
Reality Check - Magnetic storage media (1 message)
Reality Check - Magnetic storage media - How much do you want to know? (5 messages)
Reality Check - Magnetic storage media - How much do you want to know?-Clarification (1 message)
Reminder: SMPTE Hollywood Preservation Meeting (1 message)
Reply: negative restoration-response (4 messages)
Reply: [AMIA-L] Nitrate Picture Negatives-response (1 message)
Reply: [AMIA-L] Nitrate poisoning - article (1 message)
Reply: [AMIA-L] Preserving digital video vs. film (3 messages)
Reply: [AMIA-L] SUNRISE (2 messages)
rerunmedia announces LUSTRE kinescope processing system... (1 message)
RICHARD EICHBERG'S "DER WEG ZUR SCHANDE" (1930) (2 messages)
Safety Film (1 message)
SEAPAVAA conference in Vientiane, Laos: May 2002 (1 message)
Senior Archivist Position (1 message)
Shock and Vibration for magnetic tape recordings - How do you mon itor it? (1 message)
Sony Betacam SP obsolescence-details (3 messages)
stability of digital formats (4 messages)
Steenbecket (1 message)
Steenbecket and more (1 message)
SUNRISE (5 messages)
tape storage direction (11 messages)
Tension inside a roll of film (1 message)
Tension inside a roll of film-notes on the role of t he 'hardener' (1 message)
Tension inside a roll of film-notes on the role of the 'hardener' (3 messages)
test (1 message)
THE COWBOY CANTEEN (1 message)
The End Game and more (3 messages)
UCLA MIAS Faculty Position (1 message)
unsubscribe (1 message)
used BetaSP tapes (3 messages)
Ventilated film cans-how much is too much? (1 message)
Video Films Productions of Detroit MI? (1 message)
Visual Indexing and the Basics of Media Asset Management (1 message)
WAS: DVCAM - Suitable for Broadcast? NOW: Suitable for Backup? (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

AMIA-L Home

AMIA-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

(was tape storage direction) now MiniDV or DVD-RAM?

(was tape storage direction) now MiniDV or DVD-RAM?

Zwaneveld Eddy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 13:03:59 -0500

83 lines

Re: (was tape storage direction) now MiniDV or DVD-RAM?

James Lindner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 16:51:48 -0500

165 lines

Re: (was tape storage direction) now MiniDV or DVD-RAM?

Rina Sherman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 17:42:12 +0200

101 lines

Re: (was tape storage direction) now MiniDV or DVD-RAM?

Jeff Kreines <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 12:20:05 -0600

75 lines

Re: (was tape storage direction) now MiniDV or DVD-RAM?

Jeff Kreines <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 13:12:22 -0600

26 lines

Re: (was tape storage direction) now MiniDV or DVD-RAM?

Rina Sherman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 21:12:00 +0200

64 lines

Re: (was tape storage direction) now MiniDV or DVD-RAM?

Zwaneveld Eddy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:56:12 -0500

67 lines

Re: (was tape storage direction) now MiniDV or DVD-RAM?

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 16:47:36 EST

45 lines

Re: (was tape storage direction) now MiniDV or DVD-RAM?

Jeff Kreines <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 18:24:10 -0600

49 lines

Re: (was tape storage direction) now MiniDV or DVD-RAM?

mark welch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 19:20:07 -0800

52 lines

Re: (was tape storage direction) now MiniDV or DVD-RAM?

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 02:25:03 EST

17 lines

Re: (was tape storage direction) now MiniDV or DVD-RAM?

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 02:25:04 EST

21 lines

Re: (was tape storage direction) now MiniDV or DVD-RAM?

Rina Sherman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 09:25:09 +0200

111 lines

Re: (was tape storage direction) now MiniDV or DVD-RAM?

Rina Sherman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 09:25:15 +0200

44 lines

Re: (was tape storage direction) now MiniDV or DVD-RAM?

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 15:58:45 EST

23 lines

New Thread

16mm loop question

16mm loop question

Eve Sussman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 07:40:11 EST

13 lines

Re: 16mm loop question

James C. Cozart <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 10:24:04 EST

23 lines

Re: 16mm loop question

John P Pytlak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 13:10:36 -0500

79 lines

New Thread

35/32mm

Re: 35/32mm

Peter Eaves <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 16:35:21 -0800

20 lines

Re: 35/32mm

Alan Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 09:05:52 -0500

81 lines

Re: 35/32mm

Scott Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 12:14:44 -0600

138 lines

Re: 35/32mm

Russ Suniewick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:09:42 -0500

86 lines

New Thread

35mm 8 Plate Steenbeck for sale

35mm 8 Plate Steenbeck for sale

Jeff Kreines <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 15:28:11 -0600

23 lines

Re: 35mm 8 Plate Steenbeck for sale

Jeff Kreines <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 16:40:14 -0600

10 lines

New Thread

9/11 Footage

9/11 Footage

Kathleen Gallagher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 18:21:49 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 09:36:55 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

A Concern: Ampex 611 tape

A Concern: Ampex 611 tape

Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2002 21:26:42 -0800

41 lines

New Thread

Al Beck

Al Beck

Elif Rongen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:47:12 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

AMIA Office News

AMIA Office News

Janice Simpson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:11:59 -0800

57 lines

New Thread

Antwort: Re: [AMIA-L] Preserving digital video vs. film

Antwort: Re: [AMIA-L] Preserving digital video vs. film

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:16:38 +0100

30 lines

Re: Antwort: Re: [AMIA-L] Preserving digital video vs. film

Rina Sherman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 17:16:41 +0200

58 lines

New Thread

Antwort: Re: [AMIA-L] Preserving digital video vs.film

Re: Antwort: Re: [AMIA-L] Preserving digital video vs.film

P. Spehr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 19:23:49 -0500

50 lines

New Thread

Antwort: Re: [AMIA-L] stability of digital formats

Antwort: Re: [AMIA-L] stability of digital formats

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:39:00 +0100

81 lines

New Thread

ARSC Annual Meeting--2nd call for papers

ARSC Annual Meeting--2nd call for papers

Samuel Brylawski <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2002 15:46:02 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

Audio Heritage Preservation - NCPC Annual Conference

Audio Heritage Preservation - NCPC Annual Conference

Nicole Coppola <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2002 12:59:36 -0800

278 lines

New Thread

automated response

automated response

Grady Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 22:02:41 -0500

7 lines

New Thread

Awards Committee Seeks Nominations

Awards Committee Seeks Nominations

Margaret Compton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:54:52 -0500

86 lines

New Thread

BAD FORMATTING

BAD FORMATTING

Alison Pinsler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 11:56:27 -0500

1906 lines

New Thread

Baron Munchhausen Quiery

Baron Munchhausen Quiery

Stephen Parr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:59:53 -0800

26 lines

Re: Baron Munchhausen Quiery

Dinosaur Interplanetary Gazette <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 22:03:06 -0500

52 lines

Re: Baron Munchhausen Quiery

Scott Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 13:17:12 -0600

98 lines

New Thread

BetaSP obsolete?

Re: BetaSP obsolete?

mark welch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 08:05:58 -0800

101 lines

Re: BetaSP obsolete?

Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 08:15:09 -0800

123 lines

New Thread

Call for Papers

Call for Papers

Christine Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 14:48:30 -0500

123 lines

New Thread

Call for papers on newsreels

Call for papers on newsreels

Dan Streible <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 17:12:35 -0500

77 lines

New Thread

Catalina Island films

Catalina Island films

Helene Whitson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2002 14:01:44 -0800

30 lines

Re: Catalina Island films

Libby Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2002 19:34:59 -0800

51 lines

Re: Catalina Island films

mark welch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2002 07:18:35 -0800

51 lines

Re: Catalina Island films

Sergio Angelini <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2002 16:59:17 -0000

72 lines

New Thread

Copyright case...

Copyright case...

Jeff Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 09:11:49 -0800

15 lines

Re: Copyright case...

Jeff Kreines <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 11:44:48 -0600

14 lines

Re: Copyright case...

Dennis Doros <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 13:00:47 EST

39 lines

Re: Copyright case...

Rick Prelinger <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 10:25:33 -0800

28 lines

Re: Copyright case...

Scott W. Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 16:05:43 -0500

35 lines

Re: Copyright case...

Jeff Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:41:18 -0800

54 lines

Re: Copyright case...

Scott W. Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 18:34:17 -0500

22 lines

Re: Copyright case...

Larry Urbanski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 21:54:29 -0600

92 lines

Re: Copyright case...

Jeff Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 21:49:45 -0800

99 lines

Re: Copyright case...

Scott W. Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 09:52:33 -0500

24 lines

Re: Copyright case...

Larry Urbanski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 15:56:12 -0600

40 lines

Re: Copyright case...

Barry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 05:56:29 -0800

144 lines

Re: Copyright case...

petergoed <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 00:27:10 +1000

219 lines

Re: Copyright case...

Arel Lucas <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2002 11:22:14 -0800

35 lines

New Thread

Copyright case..., oops

Re: Copyright case..., oops

Jeff Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 21:51:26 -0800

100 lines

New Thread

Discovery Channel Footage Licensing

Discovery Channel Footage Licensing

dyna film <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:11:49 -0800

20 lines

New Thread

Employment opportunity at the Archives of Ontario

Employment opportunity at the Archives of Ontario

Epp, Mark (MBS) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:38:12 -0500

77 lines

New Thread

Employment opportunity with U.S. BBG

Employment opportunity with U.S. BBG

Pam Lenz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:16:30 -0500

288 lines

New Thread

Evaluating the tension pressure inside a roll of fil m or magnetic tape pack - part II.

Re: Evaluating the tension pressure inside a roll of fil m or magnetic tape pack - part II.

Zwaneveld Eddy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:25:00 -0500

258 lines

New Thread

Evaluating the tension pressure inside a roll of film or magnetic tape pack.

Evaluating the tension pressure inside a roll of film or magnetic tape pack.

Zwaneveld Eddy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 15:10:43 -0500

60 lines

Re: Evaluating the tension pressure inside a roll of film or magnetic tape pack.

Mick Newnham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 10:03:28 +1100

47 lines

New Thread

Feature Films, TV and Student Questions

Feature Films, TV and Student Questions

Mark Campbell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:02:18 +1100

30 lines

New Thread

FIAF CONGRESS - April 2002

FIAF CONGRESS - April 2002

Janice Simpson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 14:06:33 -0800

23 lines

New Thread

film preservation (and Bob Harris) in the news

film preservation (and Bob Harris) in the news

Rick Prelinger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:36:54 -0800

22 lines

New Thread

Fire at BiFi

Fire at BiFi

Oksana Dykyj <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:30:47 -0500

44 lines

Re: Fire at BiFi

Stephanie Andrew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 17:02:23 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

Fueling the flame: Hard Disk storage for archives

Fueling the flame: Hard Disk storage for archives

Jeff Kreines <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:15:35 -0600

82 lines

Re: Fueling the flame: Hard Disk storage for archives

John Coghill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2002 11:51:16 -0500

27 lines

Re: Fueling the flame: Hard Disk storage for archives

James Lindner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2002 09:59:06 -0500

117 lines

New Thread

fw: ONLINE GROUP TO GIVE ADVICE REGARDING COPYRIGHTS

fw: ONLINE GROUP TO GIVE ADVICE REGARDING COPYRIGHTS

Janet Marie Carleton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2002 15:35:01 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Fwd: [cml-pro] negative restoration

Fwd: [cml-pro] negative restoration

Jeff Kreines <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 07:01:44 -0600

87 lines

Fwd: [cml-pro] negative restoration

Jeff Kreines <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 23:28:11 -0600

126 lines

New Thread

Good News!

Good News!

Paul Rutan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 15:42:03 -0800

20 lines

New Thread

Gore Vidal's stuff

Gore Vidal's stuff

Michael Dancsok <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 22:02:59 -0500

26 lines

Re: Gore Vidal's stuff

Barry Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2002 06:52:05 -0800

38 lines

Re: Gore Vidal's stuff

Michael Dancsok <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 03:52:14 -0500

49 lines

Re: Gore Vidal's stuff

Snowden Becker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 11:04:28 -0800

44 lines

Re: Gore Vidal's stuff

Max <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:58:45 -0600

72 lines

Re: Gore Vidal's stuff

Michael Dancsok <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2002 01:03:47 -0500

91 lines

Re: Gore Vidal's stuff

Andrea Leigh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2002 07:31:53 -0800

55 lines

New Thread

Griffith's ABRAHAM LINCOLN

Griffith's ABRAHAM LINCOLN

Richard J. Leskosky <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 14:43:39 -0800

25 lines

New Thread

HELP SAVE THE EGLINTON THEATRE !!

HELP SAVE THE EGLINTON THEATRE !!

Ron Mann <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2002 11:38:37 -0500

30 lines

Re: HELP SAVE THE EGLINTON THEATRE !!

Darryl Wiggers <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2002 04:36:35 -0500

49 lines

Re: HELP SAVE THE EGLINTON THEATRE !!

Mark Campbell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2002 10:23:09 +1100

37 lines

Re: HELP SAVE THE EGLINTON THEATRE !!

Dinosaur Interplanetary Gazette <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2002 18:26:47 -0500

54 lines

New Thread

Home Movies, etc.

Home Movies, etc.

Steven Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 17:24:29 EST

27 lines

New Thread

in search of...

in search of...

Amy Turim and Larry Hershman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 11:40:31 -0500

62 lines

Re: in search of...

Jorge Finkielman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 10:53:09 -0800

35 lines

Re: in search of...

Amy Turim and Larry Hershman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 14:50:09 -0500

118 lines

Re: in search of...

Michael Chanan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 10:59:05 -0000

122 lines

New Thread

Incomplete film washing

Re: Incomplete film washing

Zwaneveld Eddy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 12:31:00 -0500

146 lines

Re: Incomplete film washing

Peter Amsden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 20:41:27 +0000

52 lines

New Thread

Incomplete washing (was "Tension inside a roll...")

Incomplete washing (was "Tension inside a roll...")

Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 12:18:10 -0800

35 lines

New Thread

Intellectual Property Commons

Intellectual Property Commons

Rick Prelinger <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:15:09 -0800

256 lines

New Thread

International Storage standards for film & video

International Storage standards for film & video

Caitlin Hickie (02) 9950 4128 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2002 15:10:20 +1100

30 lines

Re: International Storage standards for film & video

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2002 20:55:22 EST

14 lines

New Thread

Joliet Prison silent film

Joliet Prison silent film

Pilla, George <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 16:35:30 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

Jonathan Dennis

Jonathan Dennis

Janice Simpson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:12:57 -0800

61 lines

New Thread

LA Times Today!

LA Times Today!

Bruce and Amanda Posner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:41:04 -0500

14 lines

Re: LA Times Today!

Libby Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 13:43:41 -0800

40 lines

New Thread

mag stereo

mag stereo

Jeff Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 21:47:22 -0800

30 lines

New Thread

Mary Ellen Bute.Busby Berkeley

Mary Ellen Bute.Busby Berkeley

Bruce and Amanda Posner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 13:56:47 -0500

94 lines

New Thread

More from Macau

More from Macau

Paul Rutan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 13:14:06 -0800

31 lines

New Thread

More on Bush and Records....

More on Bush and Records....

Jeff Kreines <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:00:59 -0600

29 lines

New Thread

More on copyright case

More on copyright case

Jeff Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 09:39:23 -0800

19 lines

New Thread

More on MOMA Stills Dept

More on MOMA Stills Dept

Jessica Rosner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 00:28:31 -0500

12 lines

Re: More on MOMA Stills Dept

Pam Wintle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 09:05:07 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

negative restoration-response

Re: negative restoration-response

Zwaneveld Eddy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:54:19 -0500

197 lines

Re: negative restoration-response

Richard P. May <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 12:16:38 EST

24 lines

Re: negative restoration-response

John P Pytlak <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 13:16:35 -0500

72 lines

New Thread

negative restoration-response-clarification on wetga te printing

Re: negative restoration-response-clarification on wetga te printing

Zwaneveld Eddy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 13:16:46 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

new copyrights on old cartoons

new copyrights on old cartoons

Ken Horowitz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2002 17:55:40 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

new email address

new email address

Francine Lastufka Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2002 16:57:12 -0900

11 lines

Re: new email address

Loretta Ayeroff <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 12:09:17 EST

14 lines

Re: new email address

Loretta Ayeroff <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 14:23:09 EST

11 lines

New Thread

New Member with "dumb question"

New Member with "dumb question"

Mark Campbell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 08:45:22 +1100

29 lines

Re: New Member with "dumb question"

John P Pytlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 07:55:08 -0500

75 lines

New Thread

New NEDCC Conference

New NEDCC Conference

Ginny Hughes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 12:32:57 -0500

184 lines

New Thread

Nitrate Picture Negatives

Nitrate Picture Negatives

Reeves Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 07:36:05 -0800

31 lines

New Thread

Nitrate Picture Negatives-response

Re: Nitrate Picture Negatives-response

Zwaneveld Eddy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:46:36 -0500

53 lines

Re: Nitrate Picture Negatives-response

Mick Newnham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 10:45:03 +1100

65 lines

Re: Nitrate Picture Negatives-response

Dinosaur Interplanetary Gazette <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 10:30:20 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

Nitrate Picture Negatives-response comment

Re: Nitrate Picture Negatives-response comment

Sarah Stauderman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 09:37:45 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

Nitrate poisoning - article

Re: Nitrate poisoning - article

Douglas Nishimura <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 14:41:41 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

Nitrate Telecine in Chicago?

Nitrate Telecine in Chicago?

Alan J. Masson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 23:08:58 -0800

70 lines

Re: Nitrate Telecine in Chicago?

Jeff Kreines <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 04:18:12 -0600

25 lines

Re: Nitrate Telecine in Chicago?

Dennis Doros <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:10:43 EST

24 lines

Re: Nitrate Telecine in Chicago?

Jeff Kreines <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 07:27:22 -0600

16 lines

Re: Nitrate Telecine in Chicago?

petergoed <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 23:41:08 +1000

52 lines

Re: Nitrate Telecine in Chicago?

petergoed <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 00:00:40 +1000

39 lines

Re: Nitrate Telecine in Chicago?

Michael Chanan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 16:12:30 -0000

120 lines

Re: Nitrate Telecine in Chicago?

Scott Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 10:30:00 -0600

122 lines

Re: Nitrate Telecine in Chicago?

Jeff Kreines <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 11:42:04 -0600

24 lines

Re: Nitrate Telecine in Chicago?

Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 10:23:02 -0800

54 lines

Re: Nitrate Telecine in Chicago?

Robert Harris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 13:34:55 -0500

24 lines

Re: Nitrate Telecine in Chicago?

Michael Chanan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 22:38:58 -0000

38 lines

Re: Nitrate Telecine in Chicago?

Scott Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 21:00:20 -0600

44 lines

New Thread

Peerless Process

Peerless Process

Mick Newnham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 17:00:12 +1100

18 lines

Re: Peerless Process

Scott D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 17:07:35 -0600

124 lines

New Thread

Polavision

Polavision

Chris Horak <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 14:30:21 EST

58 lines

Re: Polavision

Les Cassidy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 09:06:11 +1100

63 lines

Re: Polavision

IMAP - Dara Meyers-Kingsley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 18:15:19 -0500

109 lines

Re: Polavision

Stephen Kent Jusick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 17:20:17 -0500

109 lines

Re: Polavision

Snowden Becker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 16:05:37 -0800

34 lines

New Thread

Pre-1930 footage of Northern Spain

Pre-1930 footage of Northern Spain

Mark Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 14:22:21 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Pre-Digital Days

Pre-Digital Days

Margaret Compton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:03:03 -0500

25 lines

Re: Pre-Digital Days

Chris Horak <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:12:22 EST

43 lines

New Thread

Preserving digital video on Removable Hard Disk Drives- warni ng ;-)

Re: Preserving digital video on Removable Hard Disk Drives- warni ng ;-)

Zwaneveld Eddy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 17:09:35 -0500

380 lines

New Thread

Preserving digital video vs. film

Preserving digital video vs. film

Leo Enticknap <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 22:12:41 +0000

54 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 20:07:37 EST

32 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Peter Amsden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:42:39 +0000

39 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

John P Pytlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 08:45:21 -0500

96 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Rina Sherman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 15:53:19 +0200

77 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

petergoed <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 00:10:15 +1000

124 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:09:17 EST

23 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

John P Pytlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:35:23 -0500

80 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

John P Pytlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:49:11 -0500

54 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 08:01:08 -0800

63 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 08:06:21 -0800

54 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:17:06 EST

20 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:18:54 EST

16 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:39:59 -0800

57 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Rick Prelinger <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:53:26 -0800

53 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Jeff Kreines <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:09:07 -0600

32 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Jeff Kreines <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:18:12 -0600

33 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Rick Prelinger <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:21:29 -0800

49 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 14:35:11 EST

15 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 14:35:10 EST

32 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Robert Harris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 15:43:07 -0500

54 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:50:21 -0800

44 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Peter Amsden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 22:53:18 +0000

19 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Peter Amsden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 22:56:36 +0000

21 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Jeff Goodman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 14:51:02 -0800

100 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Mick Newnham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 10:10:59 +1100

57 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 19:25:12 EST

35 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 20:03:58 EST

34 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Peter Amsden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 01:28:12 +0000

48 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Gerard Foley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:34:29 +0800

15 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Mark Campbell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 12:50:07 +1100

43 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:53:36 EST

24 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Jeff Kreines <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:29:23 -0600

20 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Jeff Kreines <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:40:42 -0600

14 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2002 00:01:29 EST

12 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Rina Sherman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2002 10:11:12 +0200

39 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Peter Amsden <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2002 11:55:19 +0000

51 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

W. Mark Ritchie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2002 10:21:02 -0500

38 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:07:50 -0800

71 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Arel Lucas <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2002 17:47:03 -0800

26 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

John Spencer <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2002 23:52:06 -0600

114 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film

Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2002 22:28:43 -0800

111 lines

New Thread

Preserving digital video vs. film - Warning LONG EMAIL

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film - Warning LONG EMAIL

James Lindner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 14:31:44 -0500

206 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film - Warning LONG EMAIL

Nick/Kate Coe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 12:35:23 -0800

212 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film - Warning LONG EMAIL

Jeff Kreines <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 15:24:43 -0600

27 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film - Warning LONG EMAIL

Reeves Bradley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 14:34:33 -0800

24 lines

Re: Preserving digital video vs. film - Warning LONG EMAIL

James Lindner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 00:08:08 -0500

78 lines

New Thread

Preserving digital video vs.film

Re: Preserving digital video vs.film

Rina Sherman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2002 10:09:56 +0200

103 lines

New Thread

Process Washes

Re: Process Washes

John P Pytlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 16:06:43 -0500

83 lines

New Thread

Processing residue

Processing residue

Tim Wagner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 16:32:39 -0500

23 lines

Re: Processing residue

Mick Newnham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:13:00 +1100

33 lines

New Thread

radio archives

Re: radio archives

Chris Hodge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:01:47 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

Reality Check

Re: Reality Check

Snowden Becker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 10:25:29 -0800

59 lines

New Thread

Reality Check - Magnetic storage media

Re: Reality Check - Magnetic storage media

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:04:52 EST

28 lines

New Thread

Reality Check - Magnetic storage media - How much do you want to know?

Reality Check - Magnetic storage media - How much do you want to know?

Zwaneveld Eddy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:28:22 -0500

289 lines

Re: Reality Check - Magnetic storage media - How much do you want to know?

Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 08:11:34 -0800

122 lines

Re: Reality Check - Magnetic storage media - How much do you want to know?

Jeff Kreines <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 12:11:47 -0600

16 lines

Re: Reality Check - Magnetic storage media - How much do you want to know?

Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 10:16:56 -0800

34 lines

Re: Reality Check - Magnetic storage media - How much do you want to know?

John Spencer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 19:11:49 -0600

40 lines

New Thread

Reality Check - Magnetic storage media - How much do you want to know?-Clarification

Re: Reality Check - Magnetic storage media - How much do you want to know?-Clarification

Zwaneveld Eddy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 12:37:11 -0500

142 lines

New Thread

Reminder: SMPTE Hollywood Preservation Meeting

Reminder: SMPTE Hollywood Preservation Meeting

Alan J. Masson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:16:56 -0800

119 lines

New Thread

Reply: negative restoration-response

Reply: negative restoration-response

Leo Enticknap <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 20:00:29 +0000

31 lines

Re: Reply: negative restoration-response

John P Pytlak <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 15:45:33 -0500

55 lines

Reply: negative restoration-response

Leo Enticknap <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 21:59:52 +0000

33 lines

Re: Reply: negative restoration-response

mark welch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 18:07:43 -0800

77 lines

New Thread

Reply: [AMIA-L] Nitrate Picture Negatives-response

Reply: [AMIA-L] Nitrate Picture Negatives-response

Leo Enticknap <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 18:55:21 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

Reply: [AMIA-L] Nitrate poisoning - article

Reply: [AMIA-L] Nitrate poisoning - article

Leo Enticknap <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 21:27:16 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

Reply: [AMIA-L] Preserving digital video vs. film

Reply: [AMIA-L] Preserving digital video vs. film

Leo Enticknap <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 20:22:48 +0000

73 lines

Re: Reply: [AMIA-L] Preserving digital video vs. film

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 20:03:59 EST

19 lines

Re: Reply: [AMIA-L] Preserving digital video vs. film

Jeff Kreines <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 21:45:44 -0600

32 lines

New Thread

Reply: [AMIA-L] SUNRISE

Reply: [AMIA-L] SUNRISE

Leo Enticknap <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 17:29:50 +0000

43 lines

Re: Reply: [AMIA-L] SUNRISE

Jorge Finkielman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:26:13 -0800

26 lines

New Thread

rerunmedia announces LUSTRE kinescope processing system...

rerunmedia announces LUSTRE kinescope processing system...

Kevin Segura <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 15:44:47 +0800

24 lines

New Thread

RICHARD EICHBERG'S "DER WEG ZUR SCHANDE" (1930)

RICHARD EICHBERG'S "DER WEG ZUR SCHANDE" (1930)

ELAINE MAE WOO <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 22:36:09 -0800

28 lines

RICHARD EICHBERG'S "DER WEG ZUR SCHANDE" (1930)

ELAINE MAE WOO <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 00:11:01 -0800

28 lines

New Thread

Safety Film

Safety Film

Bob Birchard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:12:47 -0800

17 lines

New Thread

SEAPAVAA conference in Vientiane, Laos: May 2002

SEAPAVAA conference in Vientiane, Laos: May 2002

ray <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 15:10:36 +1100

94 lines

New Thread

Senior Archivist Position

Senior Archivist Position

Francine Lastufka Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2002 13:15:55 -0900

242 lines

New Thread

Shock and Vibration for magnetic tape recordings - How do you mon itor it?

Shock and Vibration for magnetic tape recordings - How do you mon itor it?

Zwaneveld Eddy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 15:54:45 -0500

164 lines

New Thread

Sony Betacam SP obsolescence-details

Sony Betacam SP obsolescence-details

Zwaneveld Eddy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2002 11:58:31 -0500

106 lines

Re: Sony Betacam SP obsolescence-details

Darryl Wiggers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2002 12:18:29 -0500

184 lines

Re: Sony Betacam SP obsolescence-details

Zwaneveld Eddy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2002 13:51:42 -0500

216 lines

New Thread

stability of digital formats

stability of digital formats

Scott Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 13:33:29 -0500

20 lines

Re: stability of digital formats

Archives <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:00:53 -0500

40 lines

Re: stability of digital formats

James Lindner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 19:43:20 -0500

79 lines

Re: stability of digital formats

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 13:23:08 EST

48 lines

New Thread

Steenbecket

Steenbecket

Leo Enticknap <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 10:50:07 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

Steenbecket and more

Re: Steenbecket and more

Oksana Dykyj <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 11:01:11 -0500

113 lines

New Thread

SUNRISE

SUNRISE

Paul Rutan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:28:14 -0800

38 lines

Re: SUNRISE

Sergio Angelini <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 17:02:02 -0000

70 lines

SUNRISE

Leo Enticknap <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:44:13 +0000

22 lines

Re: SUNRISE

Paul Rutan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 07:27:10 -0800

33 lines

Re: SUNRISE

Jessica Rosner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:27:41 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

tape storage direction

tape storage direction

Rina Sherman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 10:04:59 +0200

40 lines

Re: tape storage direction

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:29:47 EST

17 lines

Re: tape storage direction

Dinosaur Interplanetary Gazette <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 21:58:55 -0500

43 lines

Re: tape storage direction

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 22:37:47 EST

10 lines

Re: tape storage direction

Rina Sherman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:45:27 +0200

54 lines

Re: tape storage direction

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:09:03 EST

21 lines

Re: tape storage direction

Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:22:18 -0800

57 lines

Re: tape storage direction

Mike Martz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 08:38:32 -0900

41 lines

Re: tape storage direction

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 14:19:28 EST

29 lines

Re: tape storage direction

James Lindner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 18:13:35 -0500

75 lines

Re: tape storage direction

Rina Sherman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2002 15:30:00 +0200

50 lines

New Thread

Tension inside a roll of film

Re: Tension inside a roll of film

Mick Newnham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:56:18 +1100

144 lines

New Thread

Tension inside a roll of film-notes on the role of t he 'hardener'

Re: Tension inside a roll of film-notes on the role of t he 'hardener'

Zwaneveld Eddy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 13:02:38 -0500

312 lines

New Thread

Tension inside a roll of film-notes on the role of the 'hardener'

Re: Tension inside a roll of film-notes on the role of the 'hardener'

José Llufrío <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 11:02:33 -0500

41 lines

Re: Tension inside a roll of film-notes on the role of the 'hardener'

John P Pytlak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 11:16:14 -0500

98 lines

Re: Tension inside a roll of film-notes on the role of the 'hardener'

Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 08:17:41 -0800

48 lines

New Thread

test

test

Watsky, Lance <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:00:10 -0500

9 lines

New Thread

THE COWBOY CANTEEN

THE COWBOY CANTEEN

Mike and Wendy Hicks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:29:34 -0600

79 lines

New Thread

The End Game and more

The End Game and more

James Lindner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2002 01:25:32 -0500

116 lines

Re: The End Game and more

Jim Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2002 11:14:14 EST

15 lines

Re: The End Game and more

James Lindner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2002 22:38:53 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

UCLA MIAS Faculty Position

UCLA MIAS Faculty Position

Lynn Boyden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 14:31:27 -0800

428 lines

New Thread

unsubscribe

unsubscribe

Rgandomkar <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 09:46:36 +0330

7 lines

New Thread

used BetaSP tapes

used BetaSP tapes

Sheila Krynski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 17:11:15 EST

19 lines

used BetaSP tapes

Leo Enticknap <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 23:01:58 +0000

56 lines

Re: used BetaSP tapes

Jeff Kreines <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 20:45:25 -0600

16 lines

New Thread

Ventilated film cans-how much is too much?

Ventilated film cans-how much is too much?

Zwaneveld Eddy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 17:07:24 -0500

161 lines

New Thread

Video Films Productions of Detroit MI?

Video Films Productions of Detroit MI?

Mark Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2002 06:34:32 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

Visual Indexing and the Basics of Media Asset Management

Visual Indexing and the Basics of Media Asset Management

K Spern <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2002 22:41:30 -0500

58 lines

New Thread

WAS: DVCAM - Suitable for Broadcast? NOW: Suitable for Backup?

Re: WAS: DVCAM - Suitable for Broadcast? NOW: Suitable for Backup?

Jeff Kreines <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2002 21:15:33 -0600

129 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LSV.UKY.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager